New Turning point in Pradyuman killing: CBI accuses 4 Policemen for false evidence
Four policemen from Gurugram have been charged that they had fabricated false evidence to catch the school bus driver in the case of Pradyuman’s murder.
After the arrest of the 16-year-old student in connection with Pradyuman murder on September 8 at the Ryan International School the Central Investigation Agency (CBI) team is now investigating the role of four Gururgram police personnel. These four policemen have alleged that they had fabricated false evidence to implicate the school bus driver in the case of Pradyumna murder.
CBI sources say that during the investigation, it was learned that Gurugram police wrongfully presented the evidence and broke the evidence. On the basis of these evidence, the police told the bus conductor Ashok, accused of killing seven-year-old Pradyumna Thakur.
Let me tell you that the CBI had claimed to have solved this case with the eight-second CCTV footage, which was a big mistake in the Gurugram police investigation. According to sources, in this CCTV footage, the accused student named Pradyuman and was seen leaving him.
Read: In the Pradyumn massacre, the accused’s father clarified that his son is not a drug addict
In the Pradyumn massacre, the father of the accused clarified that his son is not a drug addict and his son is mentally healthy. There is no treatment for it. At the same time, he also said that his son is being implicated unnecessarily and he has complete faith in the law.
The accused student’s father says that his son is being accused of unnecessary expenses. By force he is being framed. Regardless of the things that continue with the CBI, there is nothing to do with it too far.
The defendant’s father said that his son is being told that he is not right in the brain. I would like to ask where any treatment or medication could be shown everywhere where the treatment continued. Now the child is with the CBI. They said that my son takes drugs. Now my son is with the CBI, is my son still being drugged? He went out to get justice for a child, but on the reverse he was caught.
The defendant’s father also said that there are many irrational things said about him, which is being said that he disagrees with a large family. He is a simple person and can see any of his archives, he has complete faith in the law and he will fight against the legal battle.