SC/ST Act - wikifeed
NEWS

SC/ST Act : Supreme Court ready to hearing case in open court | News

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

SC/ST Act : Supreme Court ready to hearing case in open court Hearing from 2:00 clock.

AG demanded hearing from the center today at two o’clock. Amix Curie Amarinder Sharan opposed this.

A case has been heard in the Supreme Court on the review petition of the Center in the case of mandatory investigation before the arrest of the SC / ST Act. In the hearing, the court has given its verdict on the appeals court hearing in this open court. In the court, KK Venugopal, AG KK said that hearing today. On this Justice Adarsh ​​Goyal said that he is ready to hear the open court,

SC/ST Act - wikifeed

There is no problem but the same bench should have been decided which was the decision. Justice Goyal said that for the constitution of the bench, do the mansion in front of Chief Justice. The AG demanded hearing from the center today at two o’clock. AG KK Venugopal said in the CJI Court,

“The law system is getting worse in the country. In such a case, the matter should be heard today itself. The court accepted the demand. Amix Curie Amarinder Sharan opposes this.

After the hearing, the CJI said – the same bench will hear today at 2 pm who gave the verdict. Whether the decision has been stopped or not, the bench will decide.

Sharan said that the order of the Supreme Court can not be stopped just because the law system is getting worse. Explain that the Center has filed a reconsideration petition against the March 20 verdict. On the case, the bench of Justices Adarsh ​​Kumar Goyal and Justice UU Lalit ordered.

In the SC / ST act case, the review petition of the Central Government states that the decision of the Supreme Court of 20 March will be denied by the fundamental right to live under Article 21 given under the constitution of the SC / ST community. The crime against SC / ST is continuing. The facts show that there is a weakness in the implementation of the law and not the misuse of it. If the accused gets bail in advance, he will terrorize the victim and stop the investigation.

The provision of advance bail was added in 1973 under the authority. The court has said wrongly that refusing to give bail is a violation of the right to live.

Under Article 21, it is important to protect the rights of the accused under the jurisdiction of living under Article 21, so the people of the SC / ST community also need protection under article 17 against the Constitution and Article 17 of the Constitution. The Center has said that the petition should be heard in the open court, not in the chamber.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment